<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Waterway Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waterwaywatch.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waterwaywatch.org</link>
	<description>Communities caring for Britain&#039;s inland waterways</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PEARCE, David: AWCC Private Boating Candidate by David Pearce</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2012/01/28/david-pearce-awcc-candidate-for-a-boating-seat-on-canal-river-trust-council/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1620#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>Will Chapman, webmaster of Waterway Watch and founding Chairman of Save Our Waterways and fellow member of BWAF, has asked all CRT candidates to respond to five questions, here is my response: 
 
1. Continuous cruising - We all know that the problem is not about cruising, but  mooring.  The  answer  has  to  be  more  community-run off-line moorings,  not expensive commercial marinas. Now that sounds something very much like what AWCC started 50 years ago! 
 
2.  Residential  boating  -  This  must be accepted as a &quot;responsible&quot; activity!  I  would  defer  to  RBOA,  but  there  needs  to  be  more recognition  by  commercial marinas and local authorities that this is not only acceptable but good for them as well. 
 
3.  Mooring  auctions  &amp;  local  mooring  strategies  -  Most national user-groups were against the concept of mooring auctions and I suspect BW&#039;s  political masters put pressure on them to take a strictly market orientated  approach.  In the long term I think this should be a truly local  issue decided by the Waterway Partnerships in consultation with local authorities. Certainly, greater involvement of local communities is  necessary  as  they  are  in  the best position to judge how local mooring rules impact on their economic and recreational environment. 
 
4. Managing multiple use of towpaths - Another one for local communities, but recognising two things: 
 
Firstly, the towpath has to be in a condition where it is capable of multiple use and that may mean money, local money, to make it so.   
 
Secondly, recognition that where a boater wants to, or should  I say reasonably expects to moor, or just pull in for a bit, he/she should be allowed to do so without hassle.  Inevitably, compromise is needed. 
 
5.  Encouraging  local  community engagement - this is where the local Waterway  partnerships  should  shine.  I was involved at the start of this  and  there  is  still a long way to go. Each of the 13 or so partnerships must  establish local projects, possibly linking up with parish/borough  councils  and pre-existing groups like canal societies to  encourage  and develop waterside environments to make it something that  local  communities can be proud of. Gone are the days when the local canal doubled as the local rubbish tip! 
 
Overall - I like the boat sticker produced some years ago by the South Pennine Boat Club - &quot;Remember, canals were meant for boats&quot;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Chapman, webmaster of Waterway Watch and founding Chairman of Save Our Waterways and fellow member of BWAF, has asked all CRT candidates to respond to five questions, here is my response: </p>
<p>1. Continuous cruising &#8211; We all know that the problem is not about cruising, but  mooring.  The  answer  has  to  be  more  community-run off-line moorings,  not expensive commercial marinas. Now that sounds something very much like what AWCC started 50 years ago! </p>
<p>2.  Residential  boating  &#8211;  This  must be accepted as a &quot;responsible&quot; activity!  I  would  defer  to  RBOA,  but  there  needs  to  be  more recognition  by  commercial marinas and local authorities that this is not only acceptable but good for them as well. </p>
<p>3.  Mooring  auctions  &amp;  local  mooring  strategies  &#8211;  Most national user-groups were against the concept of mooring auctions and I suspect BW&#039;s  political masters put pressure on them to take a strictly market orientated  approach.  In the long term I think this should be a truly local  issue decided by the Waterway Partnerships in consultation with local authorities. Certainly, greater involvement of local communities is  necessary  as  they  are  in  the best position to judge how local mooring rules impact on their economic and recreational environment. </p>
<p>4. Managing multiple use of towpaths &#8211; Another one for local communities, but recognising two things: </p>
<p>Firstly, the towpath has to be in a condition where it is capable of multiple use and that may mean money, local money, to make it so.   </p>
<p>Secondly, recognition that where a boater wants to, or should  I say reasonably expects to moor, or just pull in for a bit, he/she should be allowed to do so without hassle.  Inevitably, compromise is needed. </p>
<p>5.  Encouraging  local  community engagement &#8211; this is where the local Waterway  partnerships  should  shine.  I was involved at the start of this  and  there  is  still a long way to go. Each of the 13 or so partnerships must  establish local projects, possibly linking up with parish/borough  councils  and pre-existing groups like canal societies to  encourage  and develop waterside environments to make it something that  local  communities can be proud of. Gone are the days when the local canal doubled as the local rubbish tip! </p>
<p>Overall &#8211; I like the boat sticker produced some years ago by the South Pennine Boat Club &#8211; &quot;Remember, canals were meant for boats&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BONELLO, Michael &#8211; Private Boating CRT Candidate by Ramone Taylor</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2012/02/09/bonello-michael-private-boating-crt-candidate/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramone Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1833#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>Ensure you hold plenty of Strategy meetings on the council. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ensure you hold plenty of Strategy meetings on the council.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cyclists and pedestrians clash over towpaths by Will Chapman</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2011/11/26/cyclists-and-pedestrians-clash-over-towpaths/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1424#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to say that this type of frightening and dangerous experience is not uncommon in some parts of the canal system. What part of the canal system do you use? If more people made their views known to the local British Waterways office, perhaps they would consider doing something about it before there is a serious accident.  
 
In preparation for the transition of British Waterways to new waterways charity, the Canal and River Trust, a local waterways partnership may already have been formed and if one exists in your area, it may be a good idea to write a letter of concern to them. This type of issue is one that they would/should be addressing as it concerns the welfare and enjoyment of more than one type of canal user. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to say that this type of frightening and dangerous experience is not uncommon in some parts of the canal system. What part of the canal system do you use? If more people made their views known to the local British Waterways office, perhaps they would consider doing something about it before there is a serious accident.  </p>
<p>In preparation for the transition of British Waterways to new waterways charity, the Canal and River Trust, a local waterways partnership may already have been formed and if one exists in your area, it may be a good idea to write a letter of concern to them. This type of issue is one that they would/should be addressing as it concerns the welfare and enjoyment of more than one type of canal user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cyclists and pedestrians clash over towpaths by hilaryblake</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2011/11/26/cyclists-and-pedestrians-clash-over-towpaths/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>hilaryblake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1424#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>I am in my 60&#039;s, moved to flat by canal last year, hoping to enjoy walking and cycling  on towpath.  Gave up cycling pretty quickly - and now considering giving up walking except at very quiet times of day.  Have nearly gone into canal on several occasions due to aggressive cyclists.  Really nasty incident yesterday on icy stretch with young male cyclist tearing past.  Walking can be extremely scary.  There is a passage  near were I live, by Narrow Boat pub,  with a sign asking cyclists to dismount at both ends.  its been there for a couple of months.  I have NEVER seen any cyclist dismount, and there seems to be no policing of what goes on on the towpath.  Is this the case? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in my 60&#039;s, moved to flat by canal last year, hoping to enjoy walking and cycling  on towpath.  Gave up cycling pretty quickly &#8211; and now considering giving up walking except at very quiet times of day.  Have nearly gone into canal on several occasions due to aggressive cyclists.  Really nasty incident yesterday on icy stretch with young male cyclist tearing past.  Walking can be extremely scary.  There is a passage  near were I live, by Narrow Boat pub,  with a sign asking cyclists to dismount at both ends.  its been there for a couple of months.  I have NEVER seen any cyclist dismount, and there seems to be no policing of what goes on on the towpath.  Is this the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Timetable by Geraldine Prescott</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2012/01/27/the-canal-river-trust-council/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Geraldine Prescott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1610#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Where will the first meeting take place and will any subsequent meetings be held there or elsewhere in the country. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where will the first meeting take place and will any subsequent meetings be held there or elsewhere in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TIDY, Andy: Independent Candidate for Canal &amp; River Trust Council by Will Chapman</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2012/01/28/andy-tidy-candidate-for-canal-river-trust-council/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1616#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>It is a pleasure to be of assistance and help spread the word about each candidate as completely as possible. Please let me know if you have any amendments or additions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a pleasure to be of assistance and help spread the word about each candidate as completely as possible. Please let me know if you have any amendments or additions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TIDY, Andy: Independent Candidate for Canal &amp; River Trust Council by Andy Tidy</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2012/01/28/andy-tidy-candidate-for-canal-river-trust-council/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1616#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting the extended version - it is more informative than the 150 word precis. Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting the extended version &#8211; it is more informative than the 150 word precis. Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MP Asks Minister about Canal Museums by @KirstenTElliott</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2012/01/20/mp-asks-minister-about-canal-museums/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>@KirstenTElliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1568#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>If the K&amp;A is anything to go by, the only impact the new charity is having so far is to close chunks of it. So much for cruiserway status. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the K&amp;A is anything to go by, the only impact the new charity is having so far is to close chunks of it. So much for cruiserway status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stratford River Festival June 30th &#8211; July 1st 2012 by Andrew Dyke</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2012/01/12/stratford-river-festival-june-30th-july-1st-2012/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dyke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1505#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>The following weekend there will be an even better one, with all things mentioned, in Evesham and then Pershore the weekend after that. All part of celebrating 50 years of The Avon Navigation Trust. Also visit Evesham&#039;s new pumpout facility below Eveham lock :-) Full details here - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eveshamriverfestival.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.eveshamriverfestival.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following weekend there will be an even better one, with all things mentioned, in Evesham and then Pershore the weekend after that. All part of celebrating 50 years of The Avon Navigation Trust. Also visit Evesham&#039;s new pumpout facility below Eveham lock <img src='http://waterwaywatch.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Full details here &#8211; <a href="http://www.eveshamriverfestival.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eveshamriverfestival.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on BW v Davies (re: Continuous Cruising) by Paul</title>
		<link>http://waterwaywatch.org/2011/04/15/more-on-bw-v-davies-re-continuous-cruising/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterwaywatch.org/?p=1218#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>...by the way, the court got me on intention - that my primary objective was to maintain my home and access to work when my intention should have been to navigate in good faith. Following this logic, one has to look at the primary intention of the Transport Act and section 43 upon which bw claim their guidelines are built. I&#039;d say that the primary intention of the Act is to regulate vessels used for transportation, and has nothing to do with guidelines that have no force of Law. Neither can a licence be demanded under s.43 when licencing is regulated by the BW 1976 general Canal byelaws. Thats &#163;m&#039;s unlawfully demanded and paid unnecessarily by boaters. Took me 6 months to find another job... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;by the way, the court got me on intention &#8211; that my primary objective was to maintain my home and access to work when my intention should have been to navigate in good faith. Following this logic, one has to look at the primary intention of the Transport Act and section 43 upon which bw claim their guidelines are built. I&#039;d say that the primary intention of the Act is to regulate vessels used for transportation, and has nothing to do with guidelines that have no force of Law. Neither can a licence be demanded under s.43 when licencing is regulated by the BW 1976 general Canal byelaws. Thats &pound;m&#039;s unlawfully demanded and paid unnecessarily by boaters. Took me 6 months to find another job&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

